Legal Opinion

Vetco Concrete Company v. TROY LUMBER COMPANY

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 18, 1962No. 381PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, C.J.

The defendant assigns as error the refusal of the court below to sustain its motion for judgment as of nonsuit at the close of all the evidence.

The plaintiff’s evidence establishes unequivocally that all the materials furnished by it which went into the construction of residences built on defendant’s lots were furnished pursuant to an express contract between the plaintiff and the Fore-Taylor Building Company, a corporation. The plaintiff’s evidence goes further and affirmatively establishes the fact that the materials were not sold on the credit of Troy Lumber Company.

It is equally clear…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Klebe v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Morganton Manufacturing & Trading Co. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Walker v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
  4. McLean v. KeithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Sullivan v. Detroit, Ypsilanti & Ann Arbor RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Booe v. ShadrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Snyder v. FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Southeastern Shelter Corp. v. BTU, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Root v. Allstate Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Ron Medlin Construction v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API