Legal Opinion

Miles F. Bixler Co. v. Britton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 29, 1926PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BkogdeN, J".

On 12 June, 1922, tbe defendant signed a written contract for certain jewelry named in the contract. This contract was accepted by the plaintiff on 19 Tune, 1922. Among other provisions appearing in said written contract was the following: “Salesman has no authority to change or add to these terms except in writing on this original order, which is subject to our acceptance. Not subject to countermand. Delivery to carrier is delivery to purchaser; purchaser to pay the charges. Jewelry shipped by express, show case by freight.” The defendant admitted the execution of the contract,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Redding v. Vogt.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Norfolk Southern Railroad v. SmithermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  3. Rumbough v. Southern Improvement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  4. Summerrow v. Baruch.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  5. Williams v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Pratt v. BishopSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Zinn v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. Carolina Equipment and Parts Company v. AndersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Investment Properties of Asheville, Inc. v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Whitehurst v. . Fcx Fruit and Vegetable ServiceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API