Legal Opinion

State v. Simonis

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1901PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From Union : Robert Eakin, Judge. Charles Edward Simonis was convicted of attempting to kill by means not constituting an assault, and he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Bean

In October, 1900, an information was filed by the district attorney, charging the defendant with the crime of “attempting to kill by means not constituting an assault. ’ ’ *112The jury disagreed on his first trial, but on the second he was found guilty, and sentenced to the penitentiary for three years, from which judgment he appeals, assigning numerous errors, the most important of which are the admission in evidence of the testimony of Doctor Merracle, and' overruling defendant’s motion, made at the close of plaintiff’s testimony, and renewed after all the evidence was in, .to direct a verdict…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Siebert v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Hitchcock v. BurgettMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Burns v. BarenfieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. People v. ThackerMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Polk v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1880

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Tuite v. UNION PACIFIC STAGESOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. State v. MegordenOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  3. State v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Henderson v. Union Pacific RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Northwest States Utilities Co. v. BrouiletteWyoming Supreme Court · 1937

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API