Legal Opinion

Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. of Idaho v. Cook

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 2018No. Docket 44897PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrody, Justice

This case involves the interpretation of the insuring clause of a bodily injury liability provision in a property insurance contract. This case originated from an intentional *1196 shooting at a campground. Michael Chisholm shot Joseph Stanczak during an altercation on property owned by the Cooks, who had property insurance through Farm Bureau. Farm Bureau determined it had no duty to defend or indemnify the Cooks because the shooting was not a covered act under the policy. Farm Bureau filed a declaratory judgment action seeking judicial confirmation of its determination. Farm Bureau filed a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gatx Leasing Corporation v. National Union Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  2. Houghland Farms, Inc. v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Castorena v. General ElectricIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  4. MacKay v. Four Rivers Packing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Mutual of Enumclaw v. WilcoxIdaho Supreme Court · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Valiant Idaho, LLC v. JV L.L.C.Idaho Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Ware v. City of KendrickIdaho Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Eastman v. Farmers InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Miller v. Rocking Ranch No. 3Idaho Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Durst v. ID Comm. for ReapportionmentIdaho Supreme Court · 2022

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API