Legal Opinion
Mutual of Enumclaw v. Wilcox
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided December 3, 1992No. 19403PublishedCited by 19 opinions
Idaho Falls, September 1992 Term.
1Opinion of the Court
McDEVITT, Justice.
BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS
A. The Underlying Action.
On August 18, 1989, twelve anonymous plaintiffs filed suit against Shirley Mae Wilcox (“Wilcox”), her ex-husband, the state of Idaho, and ten unnamed employees of the state of Idaho. In the complaint, plaintiffs alleged that the Wilcoxes were employed by the state of Idaho at the Child Development Center and provided respite or foster care through the state of Idaho. In addition, plaintiffs alleged that “the minor Plaintiffs suffered incidences of repeated sexual exploitation, sexual molestation, and sexual abuse…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. SippleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Penley v. Gulf Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Farmers Ins. Group v. SessionsIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
- STEIN-McMURRAY INSURANCE INC. v. Highlands Ins. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1974
- Black v. Fireman's Fund American InsuranceIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
3Cited by19 opinions
- Brumley v. LeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- City of Chubbuck v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
- Northern Security Insurance v. PerronSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
- C.P. Ex Rel. M.L. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
- North Pacific Insurance v. MaiIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.