Legal Opinion

Durst v. ID Comm. for Reapportionment

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 2022No. 49261, 49267, 49295 & 49353PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket Nos. 49261, 49267, 49295 & 49353 BRANDEN JOHN DURST, a qualified elector ) of the State of Idaho, ) ) Petitioner, ) Boise, January 2022 Term ) and ) Opinion Filed: March 1, 2022 ) CANYON COUNTY, a duly formed and ) Melanie Gagnepain, Clerk existing county pursuant to the laws and ) Constitution of the State of Idaho, ) SUBSTITUTE OPINION, THE ) COURT’S PRIOR OPINION Intervenor-Petitioner, ) DATED JANUARY 27, 2022, IS ) WITHDRAWN v. ) ) IDAHO COMMISSION FOR ) REAPPORTIONMENT, and LAWERENCE ) DENNEY, Secretary of State of the State of ) Idaho,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Simpson v. Union Oil Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Connor v. FinchSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Brown v. ThomsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Houghland Farms, Inc. v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bronco Elite Arts & Athletics, LLC v. 106 Garden City, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2023
  2. Gary Wygant v. Bill Lee, GovernorTennessee Supreme Court · 2025
  3. Planned Parenthood Great Northwest v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API