Legal Opinion

State v. Bergstrom

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 2004No. 20030160PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

676 N.W.2d 83 (2004)

2004 ND 48

STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

Zachary BERGSTROM, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 20030160.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

February 27, 2004.

Susan Schmidt (submitted on brief), Severin Ringsak & Morrow, Bismarck, N.D., for defendant and appellant.

Cynthia Mae Feland (submitted on brief), Assistant State's Attorney, Bismarck, N.D., for plaintiff and appellee.

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Zachary Bergstrom appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of Possession of Drug Paraphernalia in violation of N.D.C.C. § 19-03.4-03. We affirm.

I

[¶…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. EricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. MurchisonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. MatthewsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. BacklundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. BergstromNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. BergerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. MoranNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. HallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. FischerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API