Legal Opinion
State v. Backlund
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 2, 2003No. 20030044PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Craig Backlund appealed from a conviction entered upon a conditional guilty plea to the charge of luring a minor by computer in violation of N.D.C.C. § 12.1-20-05.1. We hold North Dakota had jurisdiction to prosecute Backlund, N.D.C.C. § 12.1-20-05.1 does not violate the Commerce Clause or the First Amendment, and the registration and notification provisions of N.D^C.C. § 12.1-32-15 do not violate procedural due process or double jeopardy. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] In March 2002, Backlund, using the screen name “baekdaddyO”, participated in an Internet chatroom from his computer…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Ex parte IngramCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Ernst v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. MoosNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
- State v. BergstromNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.