State v. Fischer
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Paul A. Fischer appealed from a criminal judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of manufacturing a controlled substance, possessing a controlled substance with intent to deliver, and possessing methamphetamine-related drug paraphernalia. We conclude the district court did not err in denying Fischer’s suppression motion. We further conclude Fischer failed to establish his court-appointed attorneys provided ineffective assistance of counsel, his due process rights were infringed by trial delay, and his jury was not impartial. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] On…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- People v. BloomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. GarzaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. TorkelsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. HallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. DahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. GatlinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.