Legal Opinion

State v. Fischer

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 2008No. 20060140PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Paul A. Fischer appealed from a criminal judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of manufacturing a controlled substance, possessing a controlled substance with intent to deliver, and possessing methamphetamine-related drug paraphernalia. We conclude the district court did not err in denying Fischer’s suppression motion. We further conclude Fischer failed to establish his court-appointed attorneys provided ineffective assistance of counsel, his due process rights were infringed by trial delay, and his jury was not impartial. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] On…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. People v. BloomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. GarzaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. TorkelsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. HallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State v. DahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. GatlinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API