State v. Bergstrom

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Zachary Bergstrom appeals from the district court’s amended order on his motion for return of property and the State’s motion for forfeiture of evidence. He argues the property was not forfeita-ble, the district court’s findings are contrary to this Court’s decision in State v. One Black 1989 Cadillac, 522 N.W.2d 457 (N.D.1994), and his due process rights have been violated by the delay between the end of his criminal case and the State’s forfeiture action. The district court’s finding of fact regarding the State!s probable cause to bring this forfeiture action is…