Legal Opinion

Ahola v. Sincock

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1959PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDieteRICH, J.

The plaintiff was taken to St. Mary’s Hospital in Superior, Wisconsin, and placed under the care of Dr. H. A. Sincock, a specialist in diseases of children, gynecology, and obstetrics, on August 26, 1953. X rays were taken and the doctor found from physical examination “that she had a fracture, a portion of which was just protruding just beneath the skin about five inches below the hip joint itself, plus multiple slit superficial abrasions of the thigh. Mostly on the top surface of the thigh.” Dr. Sincock testified as follows:

“Q. Where would you say this fracture occurred? A. I would say this…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hunter v. BurroughsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
  2. McGraw v. KerrColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Nelson v. HarringtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Wurdemann v. BarnesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Kuehnemann v. BoydWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Trogun v. FruchtmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Shier v. FreedmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Fehrman v. SmirlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Shurpit v. BrahWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. McManus v. DonlinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API