Legal Opinion

Smith v. Gorham

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1889No. 14,529PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Prom the Hendricks Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Berkshire, J. —

The administrator, Thornton G. Gorham, filed his petition to sell real estate for the payment of debts, to which the heirs of the decedent were made parties, and proper notice given. The appellants, who were not of the heirs of the decedent, claiming to have an interest in *437the real estate which the administrator was seeking to have sold, were, on their own application, made parties defendants to the petition, and appeared and filed an answer, in two paragraphs, to which demurrers were filed by the administrator and overruled by the court.

Among other things which are averred in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Scherer v. IngermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Over v. SchifflingIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Beard v. LoftonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Riser v. SnoddyIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  5. Cole v. LafontaineIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Columbia Realty Investment Co. v. Alameda Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Shepard v. GobenIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Fowler v. NewsomIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Breedlove v. BreedloveIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Waterbury v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API