Legal Opinion

Beard v. Lofton

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1885No. 11,835PublishedCited by 30 opinions

From the Washington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtZollars, J.

This action is based upon the following written contract:

“ This agreement witnesseth that we, the undersigned children and heirs of Simeon Lofton, deceased, hereby promise and undertake to pay the costs in the cause pending in the Supreme Court of Indiana, in which Mary A. Beard is appellant and David Beck, administrator of said estate, is appellee, and to pay Samuel B. Voyles $30.06, in consideration that said Mary A. Beard shall dismiss and discontinue said suit and not revive nor recommence the same again; and the undersigned hereby agree that in the distribution of said estate, Mary A.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Higham v. VanosdolIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Evansville, Indianapolis, & Cleveland Straight Line Railroad v. MeedsIndiana Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Chicago City Railway Co. v. CarrollIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Walb Construction Co. v. ChipmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
  3. City of Vincennes v. Citizens' Gas Light Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Morris v. MorrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Nave v. PowellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API