Cole v. Lafontaine
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Huntington Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The appellee instituted this proceeding as-the administrator of Francis Lafontaine, to obtain an order for the sale of the decedent’s real estate, to pay an indebtedness alleged t.o be due to Daniel R. Bearss and Moses Scott, and which had been allowed against the estate by the court-having jurisdiction of probate matters.
The second paragraph of the answer denies that the dece- ■ dent was indebted to any one. We think the demurrer to this paragraph was properly overruled. An administrator has no right to sell real estate, except where it becomes necessary to resort to it for the payment of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Potter v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Beckett v. SeloverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Caress v. FosterIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Mooers v. WhiteNew York Court of Chancery · 1822
- Propst v. MeadowsIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Anderson v. HubbleIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Scherer v. IngermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Dudley v. PiggIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Daniels v. BruceIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- Smith v. GorhamIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.