State v. Ivey
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRADY, Justice.
On 11 September 2002, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Officer Christopher Rush (Officer Rush) stopped a sport utility vehicle driven by defendant Twanprece Neshawn Ivey after defendant made a right turn without using a turn signal. Officer Rush subsequently obtained defendant’s consent and searched the vehicle, recovering a firearm. The fruit of this search was the basis of defendant’s convictions of possession of a firearm by a felon and carrying a concealed weapon. We must determine the constitutionality of the traffic stop by ascertaining whether Officer Rush had probable cause…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State v. McClendonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. StylesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
- State v. MareadyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- State v. McLambCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- State v. StylesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- State v. Kevin W. CookSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.