Legal Opinion

State v. Ivey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 18, 2006No. 458PA05PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADY, Justice.

On 11 September 2002, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Officer Christopher Rush (Officer Rush) stopped a sport utility vehicle driven by defendant Twanprece Neshawn Ivey after defendant made a right turn without using a turn signal. Officer Rush subsequently obtained defendant’s consent and searched the vehicle, recovering a firearm. The fruit of this search was the basis of defendant’s convictions of possession of a firearm by a felon and carrying a concealed weapon. We must determine the constitutionality of the traffic stop by ascertaining whether Officer Rush had probable cause…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. State v. McClendonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. StylesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  2. State v. MareadyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  3. State v. McLambCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  4. State v. StylesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  5. State v. Kevin W. CookSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API