Legal Opinion

Batchelder v. Minks

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 13, 1920No. 8564PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from District Court, McClain County ; F. B. Swank, Judge. Action by Charles S. Batchelder against William Minks to dissolve partnership and for an accounting. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtOwen, C. J.

Plaintiff and defendant formed a partnership in 1912, by oral agreement, for the purpose of farming and raising live stock. There was no definite term fixed, the relation continuing until August 9, 1915, when this action was instituted by plaintiff for dissolution and for an accounting of all the transactions of the partnership from its inception. The case was heard before a referee, and, over the objections of plaintiff, defendant offered in evidence two itemized statements of ihis adcount with plaintiff, showing certain amounts which he alleged he had paid out at the instance and upon the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Drumm-Flato Commission Co. v. EdmissonSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Drumm-Flato Commission Co. v. EdmissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  4. Kasenberg Et Ux. v. HartshornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lieuallen v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API