Legal Opinion

Lieuallen v. Young

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 10, 1925No. 15938PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THREADGILL, C.

The facts in this case, upon which the action was based, were substantially as follows: J. M. Young and John S. Sankey were partners in drilling oil and gas wells witn an equfi interest in the drilling activity. On April 30, 1921, they entered into a written agreement for the termination and settlement of the partnership affairs. Said contract was as follows:

“This agreement made and entered into on this 30th day of April, 1921, by and between J. M. Young, hereinafter called party qf the first part, and John S. Sankey, hereinafter called party of the second part,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Vance v. WhittenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Batchelder v. MinksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Cochran v. Bank of TuttleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Flesher v. FlesherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  2. Hill v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  3. Barry v. Hubbard, Adm'xSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  4. Prairie Oil & Gas Co. v. LaskeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Howe v. Farmers & Merchant BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API