Legal Opinion

McNabb v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 10, 2002No. 00-143CPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HORN, Judge.

FINDINGS OF FACT

The plaintiffs are John B. McNabb, John C. McNabb, Karen McNabb, William B. McNabb, Lisa McNabb, Michael R. McNabb, Beverly McNabb and the McNabb Farms Partnership (collectively, “McNabb”). Defendant is the United States, specifically the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) of the United States Department of the Interior. According to the joint stipulation of facts entered into by the parties, between August, 1982 and September, 1995, plaintiffs entered into approximately twenty-two leases on farm land located on the Fort Hall Indian Reservation, in Bannock…

2Cases cited140 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Franconia Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  2. Russell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  3. Klamath Irrigation District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  4. Hall v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  5. Schmidt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API