Legal Opinion

Doughman v. State

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 17, 1984No. C6-83-1779PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Petitioner appeals from the denial of his post-conviction petition to withdraw a previously negotiated guilty plea. We affirm.

FACTS

In 1981, petitioner was charged with felony theft in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.52, subd. 2(1) (1980), after tires and rims which had been reported stolen were discovered at petitioner’s home and at the home of his brother. He was found competent to stand trial at a psychiatric examination conducted pursuant to Rule 20, Minn.R.Crim.P. Following the determination of competency, petitioner and his public defender negotiated a plea agreement…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. State v. TrottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Kochevar v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. Chapman v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. BarahonaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
  2. Cameron v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. State v. HendrickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. HemmingsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API