Doughman v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Petitioner appeals from the denial of his post-conviction petition to withdraw a previously negotiated guilty plea. We affirm.
FACTS
In 1981, petitioner was charged with felony theft in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.52, subd. 2(1) (1980), after tires and rims which had been reported stolen were discovered at petitioner’s home and at the home of his brother. He was found competent to stand trial at a psychiatric examination conducted pursuant to Rule 20, Minn.R.Crim.P. Following the determination of competency, petitioner and his public defender negotiated a plea agreement…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. TrottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Kochevar v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Chapman v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. BarahonaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
- Cameron v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. HendrickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. HemmingsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.