Legal Opinion

State v. Barahona

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided April 28, 2006No. 94,130PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rulon, C.J.:

Defendant Nicomedes Barahona appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to withdraw his plea, claiming his plea hearing violated his due process rights and that he was afforded ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.

The defendant claims the district court erred in summarily denying his request to withdraw his plea. Primarily, the defendant claims the district court violated his due process rights by failing to address the defendant to determine whether the plea was entered knowingly and voluntarily. We disagree.

After sentencing, a district court may permit a defendant…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. AtteberryCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
  2. State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
  3. State v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
  4. State v. TerningCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  5. State v. SilhanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API