Legal Opinion

Cameron v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 29, 1994No. Nos. 325, 497PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALPERT, Judge.

Lest we be misunderstood by our ultimate holding, we declare at the outset that an intoxicated litigant who disrupts the proceedings of the court by contumacious or stupefied conduct may be held in contempt of court.

Appellant, John Jeffrey Cameron, appeals two judgments entered by the Circuit Court for Allegany County, the first finding him in contempt for appearing in court in an *604intoxicated condition and the second denying his motion to dismiss on the basis of double jeopardy. Appellant asks:

I. Did the trial court err in finding him in contempt of court?

II. Did the trial court…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. Roll and SchollCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  2. United States v. Stephen TellerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  3. Giant of Maryland, Inc. v. State's AttorneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. McDaniel v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  5. Rojas v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Burradell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. In Re CurdaAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. J.H. v. KirbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  4. Miller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  5. Howard County v. Pack Shack, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API