Legal Opinion

Lanham v. Amoco Oil Co.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided November 26, 1979No. Civ. B-79-14PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

C. STANLEY BLAIR, District Judge.

This is an action brought by plaintiff, as personal representative of the estate of Elgie D. Lanham, arising out of the attempted termination by defendant of its franchise relationship with her late husband. Plaintiff originally filed suit in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, but defendant removed the case to this court. The cause of action lies under the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 2801 et seq. (“the Act”). Jurisdiction thus exists under 15 U.S.C. § 2805(a) and 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Both parties have filed motions…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burka v. PatrickCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  2. Van Dyck v. BloedeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. William C. Brach, Cross-Appellant v. Amoco Oil Company, a Maryland Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  2. Russo v. Texaco, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1986
  3. Huth v. B.P. Oil, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1983
  4. Lyons v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1981
  5. Shell Oil Co. v. KozubDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API