Legal Opinion
Shell Oil Co. v. Kozub
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided November 7, 1983No. Civ. A. C83-794PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ANN ALDRICH, District Judge.
Shell Oil Company (“Shell”) brings this action to terminate the franchise under which defendant Jack Kozub operates a Shell service station in Brecksville, Ohio. Pending before the Court are Shell’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Kozub’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction permitting him to retain the franchise until a final judgment is entered. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion for Summary Judgment is granted and the Motion for a Preliminary Injunction is denied.
The Petroleum Marketing Practices Act (“PMPA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 2801-2806,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Humboldt Oil Co., Inc., and J.R. Mastelotto v. Exxon Company, U.S.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Walters v. Chevron U. S. A., Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1979
- Crown Central Petroleum Corp. v. WaldmanDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Malone v. Crown Central Petroleum Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1979
- Di Napoli v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Maylon B. Clinkscales T/a Clinkscales Oil Company v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Shell Oil Co. v. Altina Associates, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1994
- State Oil Co. v. KhanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
- Marathon Petroleum Co. v. PendletonDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1988
- Texaco Refining and Marketing Inc. v. DavisDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.