Legal Opinion
Huth v. B.P. Oil, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided January 7, 1983No. Civ. Y-82-2927PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JOSEPH H. YOUNG, District Judge.
Defendant has filed a “Motion to Dismiss, Or, In the Alternative, For Summary Judgment” in the above entitled action. As resolution of the matter has required the Court to look beyond the allegations on the face of the pleadings, the Court treats defendant’s motion as being one exclusively for summary judgment. Fed.R. Civ.P. 12(b). For the reasons outlined below, the Court agrees with defendant that the relevant statute of limitations has run. Consequently, the Court grants defendant summary judgment in its favor.
Plaintiffs present…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Ray v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Bailey v. GreenbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Consumers Petroleum Co. v. Texaco, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Continental Enterprises, Inc. v. The American Oil Company and Amoco Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Jeetendra L. Shukla, Individually v. Bp Exploration & Oil, Inc., A.K.A. Bp Oil Company, Petro Distributing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 71,566 in Re Fred Herbert, Debtor. Atlantic Richfield Company v. Fred HerbertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.