Legal Opinion

Burka v. Patrick

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 8, 1976No. 388, September Term, 1976PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, C. J.

The premier question asked in this appeal is, does the death of a party to a contract to purchase realty constitute legally excusable impossibility of performance. The appellants, Edith H. Burka, personal representative of the estate of her deceased husband, Sam Burka, and herself, individually, a party purchaser under the contract, are of the belief that when “one [is] dead, [t]he other [is] powerless to [perform].” 1 On the other hand, the appellee, Kenneth A. Patrick, is seemingly of the view that contracts, like heirs and taxes, survive the grim reaper’s harvest.

Before undertaking to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. The Kronprinzessin CecilieSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Day v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Rishel v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  4. Waldorf v. WaldorfSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  5. United States Ex Rel. Wilhelm v. ChainSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Colorado National Bank of Denver v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. McDonald v. PettusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Bruce v. DyerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  4. Trahan v. TrahanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
  5. Cole, Raywid & Braverman v. Quadrangle Development Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API