Burka v. Patrick
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, C. J.
The premier question asked in this appeal is, does the death of a party to a contract to purchase realty constitute legally excusable impossibility of performance. The appellants, Edith H. Burka, personal representative of the estate of her deceased husband, Sam Burka, and herself, individually, a party purchaser under the contract, are of the belief that when “one [is] dead, [t]he other [is] powerless to [perform].” 1 On the other hand, the appellee, Kenneth A. Patrick, is seemingly of the view that contracts, like heirs and taxes, survive the grim reaper’s harvest.
Before undertaking to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- The Kronprinzessin CecilieSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Day v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Rishel v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- Waldorf v. WaldorfSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
- United States Ex Rel. Wilhelm v. ChainSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Colorado National Bank of Denver v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- McDonald v. PettusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Bruce v. DyerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Trahan v. TrahanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
- Cole, Raywid & Braverman v. Quadrangle Development Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.