Legal Opinion

Brillhardt v. Ben Tipp, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1956No. 33296PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOtt, J.

In August, 1951, the defendant, Ben Tipp, Inc., began to use a new supply of one thousand twenty sales books, each containing fifty sets of sales slips in triplicate, upon which the telephone number of plaintiff Brillhardt’s place of business had been printed by mistake. After the defendant started using the sales books, frequent calls for the defendant’s store came to the plaintiff’s business office.

Plaintiff discovered the mistake when one of the callers insisted that the number called was on the defendant’s sales slip. The plaintiff promptly called the defendant corporation and complained…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gardner v. SeymourWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Home Insurance v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Arnold v. SanstolWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Sprague v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Riblet v. Spokane-Portland Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bylsma v. Burger King Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2013
  2. MacCa v. General Telephone Co. of Northwest, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Biles-Coleman Lumber Co. v. LesamizWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Murphy v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Irwin v. SandersWashington Supreme Court · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API