Legal Opinion

Fines v. West Side Implement Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1960No. 34894PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

— This is an action for damages based on a claimed rescission of the contract for the sale of a harvester. The defendants were the dealer, who sold the harvester to the plaintiff, and the manufacturer of the harvester. The trial court dismissed the action as to the manufacturer at the close of the plaintiff’s case, and the plaintiff appeals.

Two issues are presented by the parties to this appeal:

1. Was there evidence to go to the jury that the plaintiff, Merritt Fines, relied on a false statement or statements contained in the advertising literature of the manufacturer, the defendant…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Baxter v. Ford Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Schmidt v. MesmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Salter v. HeiserWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Estrada v. AlvarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Freeman v. NavarreWashington Supreme Court · 1955

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hoke v. Stevens-Norton, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Underwood v. SternerWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Kammerer v. Western Gear Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  4. Clover Park School District No. 400 v. Consolidated Dairy Products Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  5. Town of La Conner v. American Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API