Legal Opinion
Mwithiga v. Uber Techs., Inc.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided March 14, 2019No. Case No.: 2:18-cv-00768-GMN-CWHPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge
Pending before the Court are Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc.'s ("Defendant") Motion to Compel Arbitration, (ECF No. 10), and Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, (ECF No. 11);1 or, in the alternative, Motion to Stay During Pendency of Arbitration, (ECF No. 12). Pro se Plaintiff Peter Mwithiga2 ("Plaintiff") filed a single *1055Response, (ECF No. 13),3 to the Motions. Defendant filed a Reply, (ECF No. 20), and Plaintiff filed a Surreply, (ECF No. 21).
Also pending before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Surreply, (ECF No. 22), or, in the alternative, Motion for Leave to File…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Broadnax v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2025
- Christensen v. Findlay ARN, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025
- Coleman v. Alaska USA Federal Credit UnionDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2020
- Global Tech Industries Group, Inc. v. Go Fun Group Holdings, LtdDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Gonzales v. Sitel Operating CorporationDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.