Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Fritz

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 31, 1933No. Docket No. 8862PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLING, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by C. Alvin Muller, as executor of the will of Lisetta E. Fritz, deceased, from an order of the superior court sustaining two certain objections to the account of appellant as such executor and directing him to restate his account. At the date of the testatrix’s death two joint bank accounts stood in the names of appellant and the testatrix. One in the Central Savings Bank of Oakland in the sum of $3,757.56 and the other in the Bank of California in San Francisco in the sum of $1428. In his account the appellant failed to include either amount, claiming…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. McMurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. In Re Estate of GurnseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Estate of McCarthyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Hill v. BadeljyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Rowe v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Andrews v. California Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Estate of WatkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Wallace v. RileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Paterson v. ComastriCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Holt v. BaylesUtah Supreme Court · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API