Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Martin Robowash, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided June 15, 1970PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatherne, J.

Complainants filed suit in equity wherein they seek a decree declaring title in them to a certain town lot in Martin, Tennessee, and a decree setting aside as null and void a deed under which defendant Martin Robowash, Inc. holds possession of the lot. The Chancellor, hearing the case on oral testimony without a jury, held in favor of the Complainants and decreed them the owners of the lot in question.

The appellants are the original defendant Martin Ro-bowash, Inc. and its immediate predecessor in title, the Futrells, who by separate appeal present the following-issues: (1) The Chancellor…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. McPhailTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Loftis v. Stuyvesant Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1965
  3. Keel v. SuttonTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Preston v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956
  5. Sunderhaus v. Perel & LowensteinTennessee Supreme Court · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Cumulus Broadcasting, Inc. v. ShimTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Liddy v. LamoneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Dennis Joslin Co., LLC v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
  4. Hannewald v. Fairfield Communities, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
  5. American University Park Citizens Ass'n v. BurkaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API