Legal Opinion

Keel v. Sutton

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1919PublishedCited by 20 opinions

FROM SHELBY. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Shelby County. —Hon. IsRael H. Pebes, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bachman

By this proceeding in ejectment complainants sought to recover from defendants, F, R. Humphrey and'L. C. Sutton, a certain tract of land on the Mississippi river, in Shelby county.

It is alleged in the bill that the complainants, as the heirs at law of their father and those under whom he claimed, had, prior to the year 1897, been in the open and adverse possession of the property for a period of more than thirty years and that on account of the encroachment of the Mississippi river in the year. 1897 the property became untenantable, and they were compelled to abandon the same. It is further…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. St. Louis v. RutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Mulry v. . NortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Stockley v. CissnaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
  4. State v. Muncie Pulp Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Stockley v. CissnaTennessee Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Cumulus Broadcasting, Inc. v. ShimTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Doris J. Mikel v. Robert S. Kerr, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  3. Freeman v. Martin Robowash, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1970
  4. Derryberry v. LedfordCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1973
  5. Moore v. BrannanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1957

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API