Sunderhaus v. Perel & Lowenstein

The Chancellor sustained a demurrer to the original hill in this ease as amended. The appellant, Virginia Sunderhaus, has perfected an appeal to this Court.

The original hill alleges that on February 10, 1958 complainant purchased a diamond ring from the defendant, Perel & Lowenstein, for the sum of $699.25 and received from the defendant a written warranty guaranteeing to complainant the perfection of the ring, its value, style, and trade-in value. This written warranty is made an exhibit to the original bill.

It is further alleged in the original bill that thereafter complainant desired to…