Legal Opinion

Warner and Swasey Company v. Held

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided July 20, 1966No. 62-C-230, 62-C-231PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

REYNOLDS, District Judge.

These cases are suits for the infringement of the claims of several patents and have been consolidated for the purposes of trial.

Plaintiff produces a cutoff tool and holder with a removable cutting insert bit. Plaintiff has a patent, No. 2,846,756, upon the entire combination and a separate patent, No. 2,964,833, upon the removable insert bit.

Plaintiff alleges that defendants in both cases have (1) directly infringed Patent No. 2,964,833 by making and selling insert bits of the type covered by the claims of such patent; (2) directly infringed Patent…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Wilson v. SimpsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  4. Inglett & Company, Inc. v. Everglades Fertilizer Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  5. Samuel Goldwyn, Inc. v. United Artists CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hensley Equipment Company, Inc. v. Esco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  2. Van Dyke Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1975
  3. City Federal Savings and Loan Ass'n v. CrowleyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1975
  4. Haviland & Co. v. Johann Haviland China CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  5. R2 Medical Systems, Inc. v. Katecho, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API