THOMSON MACHINERY COMPANY v. LaRose
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
HEEBE, District Judge.
This cause came on for hearing on a previous day on objections filed by all parties to the findings of fact and conclusions of law rendered by the special master on the statement of the account, pursuant to Rule 53(e) (2) F.R.Civ.P. Having considered the arguments of counsel, having studied the legal memoranda submitted by both parties, and having considered the evidence presented to the special master, the Court is now advised in the premises and makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law. Plaintiff, Thomson Machinery Company, and third-party defendant,…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Hoeltke v. C. M. Kemp Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Milgo Electronic Corporation, a Florida Corporation v. United Business Communications, Inc., a Kansas Corporation, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. ReedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Rakes v. ColemanDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1970
- Kori Corp. v. Wilco Marsh Buggies & Draglines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1982
- Homewood Industries, Inc. v. CaldwellDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.