Legal Opinion

RPTZ-Patco, Inc. v. Pacific Inland Navigation Company

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided March 31, 1966No. Civ. 63-109PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KILKENNY, District Judge:

Plaintiff charges the defendant with an infringement of the Pickrell Patent, U. S. Letters Patent No. 3,033,150. Defendant counters with a challenge to the validity of the patent.

The patent covers a barge, designed for the simultaneous transport of petroleum products and dry cargo, under conditions which meet Coast Guard safety standards. Described, is a V-shaped dry cargo hold, immediately below the weather deck and extending over the length of the barge’s storage area. Below this hold is a cofferdam, V, in shape, an empty space between two V-shaped layers of the dry…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Canaan Products, Inc. v. Edward Don & CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1966
  2. Trimble Products Inc. v. W. T. Grant Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  3. Rosen v. Lawson-Hemphill, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1975
  4. Skil Corp. v. Lucerne Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1980
  5. RPTZ-Patco, Inc. v. Pacific Inland Navigation Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API