Hobbs v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NELSON, Presiding Judge.
The sole question before this Court for review is whether the Industrial Commission properly computed petitioner’s average monthly wage for purposes of determining the workmen’s compensation benefits to which he was entitled.
Petitioner, a seasonal worker, earned $10,686 in one year as a migrant worker. Of that • sum, petitioner expended and claimed an income tax deduction of $1,555 as travel expenses. The Industrial Commission, in computing petitioner’s average monthly wage, subtracted the amount claimed as travel expenses from petitioner’s gross annual…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pettis v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Moorehead v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Powell v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Floyd Hartshorn Plastering Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Haynes v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Still v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Harvey Auto Supply Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Scyphers v. H & H LUMBERMontana Supreme Court · 1989
- Ridgway v. Board of Ford County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1987
- Oak Indus. v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987