Oak Indus. v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONTRERAS, Judge.
This is a special action review of an Industrial Commission award for permanent partial disability benefits based on adjusted gross income (gross income less unreimbursed business expenses). The sole issue is whether the deduction of unreimbursed business expenses is permitted in determining claimant’s post-injury earning capacity. We conclude that in the context of the present case, it is permitted and therefore affirm the award.
The facts are undisputed. Before the industrial injury, the respondent employee (claimant), a salesman, earned a salary plus commission.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Whyte v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Pettis v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Moorehead v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Arizona Public Service Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Senor T's Restaurant v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Schuck & Sons Construction v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Long v. Injured Workers' Insurance FundCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Reavis v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Vite v. ViteCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
- Elias v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992