Legal Opinion

Moorehead v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 19, 1972No. 1 CA-IC 611PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAIRE, Chief Judge,

Division 1.

In this review by certiorari of an Industrial Commission award affirming the hearing officer’s decision in a workmen’s compensation proceeding, we are asked to determine whether the hearing officer committed error in establishing the petitioner’s average monthly wage when he refused to consider amounts paid to the petitioner by his employer for travel expenses.

No question is raised on review by either party concerning the amounts actually used by the hearing officer in establishing petitioner’s average monthly wage at $924.51 per month. The sole question raised…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matlock v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Pettis v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Ebasco Services, Inc. v. BajbekArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Thibeault v. General Outdoor Advertising Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Bosworth v. 7-Up Distributing Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
  2. Layne Atlantic Co. v. ScottDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Southwest Architectural Products, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
  4. Harvey Auto Supply Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  5. Scott v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API