Legal Opinion

Mumford v. Interplast, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 1997No. 1419PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fain, Judge.

Third-party defendant-appellant Indiana Insurance Company appeals from a summary judgment rendered in favor of third-party plaintiff-appellee Interplast, Inc. Indiana Insurance contends that the trial court erred in concluding that the insurance company had a duty to defend and indemnify Interplast and its named employees from liability because plaintiff Nicole L. Mumford’s complaint arguably or potentially established that the employees committed negligent acts within the scope of their employment.

Contrary to Indiana Insurance’s contentions, we conclude that the trial court did…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. City of Willoughby Hills v. Cincinnati InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Preferred Risk Insurance v. GillOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. PeaglerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Physicians Insurance v. SwansonOhio Supreme Court · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Adkins v. Bratcher, 07ca55 (1-2-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Bogner Constr. Co. v. Field Assoc., 08 Ca 11 (1-13-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Estate of Rhome v. Usccs, Ltd. Partnership, 2006ca00185 (5-29-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. Hyster-Yale Grp., Inc., Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2018
  5. Dorothy MACKEY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David W. MILAM, Travis Elmore, and United States of America, Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API