Legal Opinion

Hammond v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided August 15, 2003No. CIV.A. 02-2509-CMPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*669 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WAXSE, United States Magistrate Judge.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Discovery Responses (doe. 25). Plaintiffs request an order compelling Defendant to withdraw its objections and fully respond to Plaintiffs’ Interrogatory Nos. 2-5, 8, 12, and 13. In addition, Plaintiffs seek their costs and expenses in filing this motion. Defendant has filed its response opposing Plaintiffs’ motion. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Discovery Responses (doc. 25) will be granted in part and denied in part.

I. Background

Plaintiffs bring…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Sheldon v. VermontyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2001
  3. General Electric Capital Corp. v. Lear Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2003
  4. McCoo v. Denny's Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000
  5. Kane v. Gage Merchandising Services, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Sonnino v. University of Kansas Hospital AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
  2. Swackhammer v. Sprint Corp. PCSDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
  3. In re Urethane Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2009
  4. Sonnino v. University of Kansas Hospital AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
  5. Directv, Inc. v. PuccinelliDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API