Legal Opinion
Kane v. Gage Merchandising Services, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided April 4, 2001No. CIV.A. 00-40185-NMGPublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GORTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Robert Kane (“Kane”), brings this action against defendants, Gage Merchandising Services, Inc. (“Gage”), AHL Services, Inc. (“AHL”), and Argenbright, Inc. (“Argenbright”) (collectively, “the Defendants”), on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated to recover overtime compensation pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. Pending before this Court is plaintiffs motion seeking 1) an order directing the Defendants to provide plaintiff with the names and last known mailing and e-mail…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Hoffmann v. Sbarro, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Sperling v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
- Mooney v. Aramco Services Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Church v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Leuthold v. Destination America, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
- Trezvant v. Fidelity Employer Services Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
- Olivo v. GMAC Mortgage Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
- Roy v. FedEx Ground Package Sys., Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Edwards v. City of Long BeachDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.