Legal Opinion
General Electric Capital Corp. v. Lear Corp.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided May 20, 2003No. 01-2172-GTVPublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WAXSE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is a Motion to Compel (doe. 98) filed by third party defendants and counterclaimants Excel Laminates and David Seitter (collectively “Excel”) seeking production of documents and answers to interrogatories from defendant and third party Plaintiff Lear Corporation (“Lear”). Excel also moves the Court to hear oral argument on its Motion (doc. 108). The Court does not believe that oral argument is necessary and therefore will deny the request.1
Upon consideration of the arguments presented, and for the reasons…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Federal Open Market Committee of Federal Reserve System v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sheldon v. VermontyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2001
- McCoo v. Denny's Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- Horizon Holdings, L.L.C. v. Genmar Holdings, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2002
- Snowden v. Connaught Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Moses v. HalsteadDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2006
- Sonnino v. University of Kansas Hospital AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- Johnson v. Kraft Foods North America, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2006
- Cardenas v. Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2005
- Cardenas v. Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2005
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.