Legal Opinion

In re Urethane Antitrust Litigation

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided August 11, 2009No. 04-MD-1616-JWLPublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*571 ORDER

JAMES P. O’HARA, United States Magistrate Judge.

This multidistriet litigation consists of numerous class action lawsuits in which plain*572tiffs claim that defendants engaged in unlawful price fixing and market allocation conspiracies with respect to urethane chemical products in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. Currently before the court is plaintiffs’ motion (doc. 855) to compel defendants1 to produce documents responsive to plaintiffs’ discovery requests even if those documents only relate to foreign commerce. After carefully considering the parties’ arguments, the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. Empagran S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Sheldon v. VermontyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2001
  4. In Re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Sonnino v. University of Kansas Hospital AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Kinetic Concepts, Inc. v. Convatec Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2010
  2. McConnell v. Canadian Pacific Realty Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. First Niagara Risk Management, Inc. v. FolinoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. AF Holdings LLC v. Does 1-1,058District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  5. In re Milo's Kitchen Dog Treats Consolidated CasesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2015

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API