Legal Opinion

Swackhammer v. Sprint Corp. PCS

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided December 13, 2004No. 03-2548-CM-DJWPublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WAXSE, United States Magistrate Judge.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (doc. 67). Plaintiff seeks to compel Defendant to respond to certain interrogatories and to produce three documents identified in Defendant’s Amended Privilege Log that Plaintiff contends are not privileged. Plaintiff indicates in her reply brief that all issues relating to the Amended Privilege Log have been resolved. The Court will therefore address only the interrogatory answers.

I. Introduction

This is an employment discrimination action brought pursuant to Title VII of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Deniece Scales v. J.C. Bradford and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  2. Sonnino v. University of Kansas Hospital AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
  3. Pulsecard, Inc. v. Discover Card Services, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
  4. McCoo v. Denny's Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000
  5. Williams v. Board of County Commissioners of the Unified Government of Wyandotte CountyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Rogers v. GiurbinoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2012
  2. Mancia v. Mayflower Textile Servs. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2008
  3. Bryant v. ArmstrongDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2012
  4. Johnson v. Kraft Foods North America, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2006
  5. Johnson v. Kraft Foods North America, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2006

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API