Legal Opinion
Boen Hardwood Flooring, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 2, 2004No. 03-1287PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, Chief Judge.
The United States Customs Service (“Customs”) appeals the judgment of the Court of International Trade, which held that Boen Hardwood Flooring, Inc.’s (“Boen”) imported hardwood flooring should not be classified under heading 4412 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) as “plywood.” Boen Hardwood Flooring, Inc. v. United States, 254 F.Supp.2d 1349 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2003). Because the trial court incorrectly defined the term “plywood,” we reverse.
Background
In 1995, Boen imported laminated floor panels into the United States. The panels are composed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Medline Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- General Electric Company - Medical Systems Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Kahrs International, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Bauer Nike Hockey Usa, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Cummins Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
- Faus Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Intercontinental Marble Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.