Legal Opinion
Boone v. Wright
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 11, 1991No. CV 89-1059; CA A64820PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*283DE MUNIZ, J.
Petitioner filed a petition for post-conviction relief. It was dismissed on the ground that his claim was barred by the Statute of Limitations. He appeals. The issue is whether the 1989 amendment to the Post-Conviction Hearing Act (“the Act”),1 adding a limitation period, applies to petitioner, whose conviction was entered before the amendment’s effective date. We hold that the amendment applies, and we affirm.
Petitioner was convicted of burglary in the second degree. ORS 164.215. His conviction became final on May 23, 1989. At the time, ORS 138.510(2)providedthatapetitionfor…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Texaco, Inc. v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Wilson v. IsemingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Whipple v. HowserOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Joseph v. LoweryOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. AshleyOregon Supreme Court · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Boone v. WrightOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. DufortCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Fine v. ZenonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Reeve v. MaassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- De La Cruz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.