Legal Opinion

De La Cruz v. State

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 26, 1992No. CV 90-0836; CA A69929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant filed a petition for post-conviction relief on August 17, 1990. The trial court’s judgment of conviction had been entered on February 20, 1985. Effective August 5, 1989, a 120-day Statute of Limitations applies to petitions for post-conviction relief. ORS 138.510(2). The petition was untimely. Boone v. Wright, 110 Or App 281, 822 P2d 719 (1991). The state asserts the timeliness issue for the first time on appeal. The state, as respondent, is entitled to assert that the judgment of the post-conviction court was correct for that reason. Tarwater v. Cupp, 304 Or 639, 644 n 5, 748 P2d…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moen v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Tarwater v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Boone v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. Moen v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Palmer v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. Palmer v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API