Legal Opinion

American Motors Corp. v. Labor & Industry Review Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1984No. 82-389PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Bablitch, J.

The Labor and Industry Review Commission (LIRC) seeks review of a decision holding that Sharon Basile, who is four feet, ten inches tall, and who American Motors Corporation (AMC) did not hire for a particular job because of her small stature, is not handicapped under the Wisconsin *708Fair Employment Act (Act). The issue for review is whether Basile is handicapped within the meaning of the Act because of her small stature.

Because Basile’s stature is not a disability or impairment that makes achievement unusually difficult or that limits her capacity to work, and because AMC did not perceive her…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boynton Cab Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Dairy Equipment Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Barnes v. Washington Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  4. State v. MendozaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & P. RR. CO. v. ILHR Dept.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. New York State Board of Law ExaminersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  2. Steven L. Anders v. Waste Management of Wisconsin, Incorporated, Subsidiary, and Waste Management, Incorporated, a Parent CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  3. Cassista v. Community Foods, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1993
  4. City of La Crosse Police & Fire Commission v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Racine Unified School District v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API