Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Sandstrom v. District Court in & for the County of Pueblo

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 15, 1994No. 94SA235PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Vollack

In this original proceeding pursuant to C.A.R. 21, 1 we issued a rule directing the respondent district court (the district court) to show cause why it should not be prohibited from removing the petitioner, the District Attorney for the Tenth Judicial District, State of Colorado (the district attorney 2 ), from prosecution of a criminal case against Paul Vince Maurello (Maurello) on the ground that the district attorney had an interest in the outcome of the ease since the district attorney was simultaneously prosecuting a civil forfeiture case. We now make the rule absolute.

I

On November 12,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. MiltonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. People v. GarciaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. Halaby, McCrea & Cross v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. Myers v. District Court for Fourth Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  5. People v. DISTRICT COURT, IN & FOR SECOND JUD. DIST.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Fognani v. YoungSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  2. People v. PalomoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  3. People v. C.V.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  4. People v. MerchantColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. People v. SommersColorado Court of Appeals · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API