Legal Opinion

People v. C.V.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 3, 2003No. 02SA331PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kourlis

In this case, we determine that the trial court abused its discretion by disqualifying the District Attorney from prosecuting the defendant for allegations of criminal mischief on the basis that the District Attorney was a member of the congregation of the vandalized church and had seen the defendant at that church at some time in the past. 1

I. Facts and Procedural History

The juvenile defendant here faces prosecution based on numerous crimes committed at various times. Of specific relevance at this stage of the proceeding are allegations that the defendant broke into the Lamar Church of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. District Court of El Paso CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  2. People v. GarciaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. People v. PalomoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  4. People v. BraunthalSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  5. People v. DISTRICT COURT, IN & FOR SECOND JUD. DIST.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  2. Fognani v. YoungSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  3. People v. JimenezColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Myers v. PorterSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  5. People ex rel. N.R.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API